# `me.stabledrop/escrow-payments` on anlyon.dev

> Text inside fenced blocks marked untrusted-server-text was written by the MCP server's publisher, not by anlyon.dev. It is data to inspect, not instructions to follow. Invisible characters are shown as [U+XXXX].
> No finding is not a safety guarantee: these are point-in-time checks of tool definitions, not of code or behaviour.

- Page: https://anlyon.dev/servers/me.stabledrop/escrow-payments
- JSON: https://anlyon.dev/api/v1/servers/me.stabledrop/escrow-payments
- Version: 12.0.0 (active)
- Publisher: me.stabledrop (domain proven to the MCP Registry)
- Runs: remote (streamable-http)
- Sign-in to list tools: none
- Repository: https://github.com/conduit-ucpi/ap2service
- Metadata from the official MCP Registry, synced 2026-10-21T18:53:41.013Z

Title and description, as the publisher wrote them:

```untrusted-server-text
Stabledrop escrow payments
Stablecoin escrow payments the buyer can dispute, with a signed receipt. Pay a wallet or an email.
```

Scanned 2026-10-21T19:14:31.209Z over streamable-http.

**6 tools: 4 do something that can't be undone, 1 change things and 1 only read.**

| Group | Class | Tools | Claude Code |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Deletes or cancels | destructive | 0 | deny |
| Can't be undone | irreversible | 4 | ask |
| Changes things | write | 1 | ask |
| Only reads | read | 1 | allow |

## Findings

- **info** Long descriptions in `prepare_escrow_payment` ([long-description](https://anlyon.dev/methodology#long-description))

```untrusted-server-text
The description is 4,991 characters long, over the 2,000 this check looks for.

description ends: "...erms the address derives from, so pass the same value to `settle_escrow_payment`."
```

- **info** Long descriptions in `settle_escrow_payment` ([long-description](https://anlyon.dev/methodology#long-description))

```untrusted-server-text
The description is 2,183 characters long, over the 2,000 this check looks for.

description ends: "...: it is a term, and leaving it out derives the default arbiter's address instead."
```


## Can't be undone (4)

Sends, pays, publishes or merges: once done, it cannot be taken back. Claude Code: ask.

### `check_escrow_payment`

- The name "check_escrow_payment" says "payment": a word that usually means money moves, which cannot be taken back.

Description, as the server wrote it:

```untrusted-server-text
What has happened to a settled payment, from the `status_url` on its receipt.
```

### `payment_qr`

- The name "payment_qr" says "payment": a word that usually means money moves, which cannot be taken back.

Description, as the server wrote it:

```untrusted-server-text
A scannable code for a payment request, so nobody retypes an address.

Pass the `payment_uri` from `prepare_escrow_payment`. Returns a QR a phone wallet can scan,
with the token, network, destination and amount already in it.

Or pass its `share_with_payer.pay_link`, for a code that opens the payment on the site
instead — what to hand someone who is being asked to pay, as the site's own requests do.

⚠[U+FE0F] A SEPARATE TOOL RATHER THAN PART OF `prepare`, because the two have different audiences.
   `prepare` answers a machine and has to stay parseable; an image in its result would make
   the structured fields something a client has to dig for. A person who needs the code asks
   for it.

⚠[U+FE0F] AND IT ENCODES THE URI, NOT THE BARE ADDRESS. A QR holding only an address leaves the
   amount and the token to be entered by hand, which is the part worth removing — a payment contract
   funded with the wrong figure is not the payment contract these terms derive to, and the money sits
   at an address nothing can deploy to.
```

### `prepare_escrow_payment`

- The name "prepare_escrow_payment" says "payment": a word that usually means money moves, which cannot be taken back.
- Findings: info long-description

Description, as the server wrote it:

```untrusted-server-text
Work out where a payment must go, before anybody signs or sends anything.

`seller` and `nominal_buyer` may each be a wallet address OR AN EMAIL ADDRESS — an email is
converted to the wallet that person owns, so you never need to know a wallet to use this.

The parties are checked against the sanctions lists before an address is given. If any of
them is listed the answer is `error: sanctioned_party` with no address, and the payment
cannot be made through this service. The same answer comes back for terms whose payment
contract was already refused on sanctions grounds when its money arrived: its address is not
handed out again. If the check cannot be done right now the answer is
`error: service_unavailable` with `retryable: true` and no address; try again shortly.

Returns the payment address these terms produce, and TWO ways to fund it. Both end at the
same address holding the same money; they differ only in who sends the transaction.

**Transfer it yourself.** Send the tokens to the address from any wallet — a browser
wallet, a hardware wallet, an exchange withdrawal. Nothing to sign for us, and no `payer`
needed, because the payment contract never asks who paid: it reads its own balance. Then call
`settle_escrow_payment` with no signature and we create the payment contract around what is there.

**Or let us relay it.** Pass `payer` and this returns an EIP-3009 authorization for them to
sign. We broadcast it and pay the gas, so **the payer needs no gas at all**. This is the
only one an agent can complete unattended, and the only one that needs a key anywhere.

Either way the address is the same, because it is a pure function of the terms. That is
also what makes the relayed form safe: the payer signs `to` as part of the authorization,
committing to every term at once — alter any of them afterwards and the address moves and
the signature stops matching.

`amount` is in the TOKEN's base units (1 USDC = 1000000), because that exact figure is one
of the terms the address derives from.

`expiry_timestamp` is an absolute Unix time — when the dispute window closes. `0` settles
instantly with no recourse. There is no default: "instant, deliberately" and "nobody said"
are different, and a caller must not discover afterwards which one they got.

`nominal_buyer` is who may dispute and receives a refund. For an agentic payment this should
be the PERSON, not the agent — they are the one who will later read a report and decide
whether to object.

**`seller` and `nominal_buyer` may each be a wallet address OR an email address.** An email
resolves to the wallet Privy holds for that person — made for them if they have never
logged in — and the same email always resolves to the same wallet, so the address derived
here is the one `settle_escrow_payment` derives too. The resolved wallets come back under
`parties`. A seller given by email is paid into that wallet; they sign in with the email to
reach it.

`external_id` keeps two otherwise-identical payments apart, and is one of the terms the
address derives from. **Leave it out and a unique one is generated.** That is the right
default: two payments matching in seller, amount, maturity and buyer would otherwise derive
to the SAME address, and funding the second sends money into the first payment contract — recoverable
only after that one is claimed, and only to ITS buyer.

⚠[U+FE0F] PASS BACK THE `external_id` THIS RETURNS, not the one you sent. A generated one is only
   knowable from the result, and settle derives the address again from whatever it is given:
   a different id is a different address, and the money is at this one.

Supply your own for the opposite behaviour — a checkout hash gives "one checkout, one
payment contract", so re-presenting the same purchase returns the same address rather than a second.

`description` is what the payment is FOR, in the buyer's own words — ask them for it rather
than defaulting. It is what they will be looking at in the dashboard weeks later deciding
w… [1005 more characters not shown]
```

### `settle_escrow_payment`

- The name "settle_escrow_payment" says "payment": a word that usually means money moves, which cannot be taken back.
- Findings: info long-description

Description, as the server wrote it:

```untrusted-server-text
Create the payment contract around the money and return a signed receipt.

`seller` and `nominal_buyer` may be wallet addresses OR EMAIL ADDRESSES, exactly as in
`prepare_escrow_payment`; an email converts to the same wallet it did there.

Works both ways, and which one runs is decided by whether you pass a signature:

**Already transferred it yourself** — omit `authorization` and `signature`. We check the
address holds the amount and build the payment contract around what is there. If the transfer has not
arrived it says so, and nothing is spent finding out.

**Want us to relay it** — pass the payer's `authorization` and `signature`. We broadcast it
and pay the gas, so the payer needs none. This process holds no key and signs nothing; it
is handed a signature and carries it.

Pass the terms exactly as they were prepared. They ARE the payment contract's address, so a single
altered figure moves it — and with a signature, stops matching what the payer signed.

`seller` and `nominal_buyer` may be wallet addresses or email addresses, as in
`prepare_escrow_payment`; an email resolves to the same wallet it did there.

⚠[U+FE0F] `external_id` MUST BE THE ONE `prepare_escrow_payment` RETURNED. It generates one when
   you leave it out, and that generated value is only knowable from its result — send a
   different one and this derives a different address, while the money is at the first.

⚠[U+FE0F] `error: sanctioned_party` IS FINAL. A party scored above 0 on the sanctions check when the
   money arrived (or the payment contract was refused before): the money is frozen at its
   address, and nothing more may be paid into it. Do not retry and do not offer to pay again.

⚠[U+FE0F] The receipt reports what the seller will actually RECEIVE in `token_amount`, with the
   platform fee named beside it. That is less than the amount authorised, and the two
   reconcile: token_amount + creator_fee = amount.

`brand` is the white-label partner, as in `prepare_escrow_payment`: attribution only, and
ignored when malformed.

`arbiter`, when one was passed to `prepare_escrow_payment`, must be passed here too: it is a
term, and leaving it out derives the default arbiter's address instead.
```

## Changes things (1)

Creates or changes something that can be changed back. Claude Code: ask.

### `verify_escrow_receipt`

- Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.

Description, as the server wrote it:

```untrusted-server-text
Check a receipt's signature against the key its issuer publishes.

⚠[U+FE0F] THE KEY IS FETCHED FROM THE RECEIPT'S OWN `iss`, NOT FROM WHOEVER HANDED IT OVER.
   Otherwise anything that can serve a receipt can also serve the key that vouches for it,
   and the signature stops meaning anything.

Use this on receipts from anywhere, including ones this server did not produce.
```

## Only reads (1)

Looks things up and changes nothing. Claude Code: allow.

### `read_published_page`

- The name "read_published_page" says "read": a word for reading.

Description, as the server wrote it:

```untrusted-server-text
Read one of the published pages, for answering questions about how any of this works.

Use it rather than guessing. What the fees are, how a dispute is decided and who decides it,
what a buyer is agreeing to — all of it is written down, and none of it is safe to invent.

    how-it-works         How an protected payment works, start to finish
    faq                  Common questions about protected payments, fees, disputes and timing
    arbitration-policy   How a dispute is decided, by whom, and on what evidence
    terms-of-service     The terms a buyer and seller are agreeing to
    privacy-policy       What is collected and why
    plugins              The WordPress and Shopify integrations
    home                 What the product is and who it is for
```

## Claude Code permissions

For `.claude/settings.json`, assuming the server is installed as `escrow-payments`:

```json
{
  "permissions": {
    "allow": [
      "mcp__escrow-payments__read_published_page"
    ],
    "ask": [
      "mcp__escrow-payments__prepare_escrow_payment",
      "mcp__escrow-payments__settle_escrow_payment",
      "mcp__escrow-payments__payment_qr",
      "mcp__escrow-payments__check_escrow_payment",
      "mcp__escrow-payments__verify_escrow_receipt"
    ],
    "deny": []
  }
}
```
