Skip to content

Money Mind — the judge

by Elimuaa · remote · no sign-in to list tools · v1.0.0 · published by GitHub user Elimuaa

Statistical adjudication for agents: backtest judges, fact-checks. Pay per call in USDC via x402.

Changes · 16
CompareRegistry entry

17 tools: 16 change things and 1 only read.

Scanned Oct 21, 2026

No check matched anything in the tool definitions. No finding is not a safety guarantee. How the checks work.

claude mcp add --transport http money-mind https://money-mind-extract.onrender.com/mcp

Tools

Open a tool for its reasons and full description. Descriptions are the publisher's own words, shown as they are.

17 tools

Changes things 16Claude Code: ask
  • abtestDid B really beat A, corrected for how many variants you compared.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
    • The server marks it read-only (readOnlyHint: true), but an annotation never lowers a class.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Did B really beat A, corrected for how many variants you compared. Did B really beat A, corrected for how many variants you compared RUNS NOW: served from a daily free allowance (250 left today), then $0.31 USDC on Base via x402. No account, no API key. Example request: {"n_a": 1200, "conv_a": 96, "n_b": 1180, "conv_b": 130}

    Annotations the server declares

    • title: Money Mind — A/B Significance
    • readOnlyHint: true
    • destructiveHint: false
    • openWorldHint: false
  • auditEvery gate we have, composed in the right order, over your whole book — including the cross-instrument check that catches one edge wearing many names.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
    • The server marks it read-only (readOnlyHint: true), but an annotation never lowers a class.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Every gate we have, composed in the right order, over your whole book — including the cross-instrument check that catches one edge wearing many names. Every gate we have, composed in the right order, over your whole book — including the cross-instrument check that catches one edge wearing many names PAID: $300.00 USDC on Base via x402. Call it to receive the payment challenge. Example request: {"bars": {"EURUSD": [{"time": "2024-01-01T00:00:00Z", "open": 1.0995, "high": 1.1001, "low": 1.0986, "close": 1.0992}, {"time": "2024-01-01T01:00:00Z", "open": 1.1002, "high": 1.1012, "low": 1.0996, "close": 1.1006}, {"t

    Annotations the server declares

    • title: Money Mind — Full Book Audit
    • readOnlyHint: true
    • destructiveHint: false
    • openWorldHint: false
  • check_eval_selectionFREE.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
    • The server marks it read-only (readOnlyHint: true), but an annotation never lowers a class.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    FREE. Use after picking the best of several prompts, models, configs or hyperparameters. Keeping the top scorer out of N is SELECTION: the winner's score is inflated simply by having looked N times, and every eval harness reports it as though one experiment were run. Give the score each variant achieved and it returns how much of the winner's margin the search itself explains, what pure noise would have handed you, and whether the excess is real. Supply n_per_variant to also learn whether your variants can be told apart at all. Call this before concluding an optimisation found something.

    Annotations the server declares

    • title: Did I really find a better prompt? (free)
    • readOnlyHint: true
    • destructiveHint: false
    • openWorldHint: false
  • check_price_dataFREE, no payment or account.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
    • The server marks it read-only (readOnlyHint: true), but an annotation never lowers a class.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    FREE, no payment or account. Audits OHLC bars for the defects that silently invalidate a backtest. Free and indicative feeds often SYNTHESISE the bar's open instead of observing it, which pins |open-close|/range near zero — measured on the same FX pairs, a free feed reads 0.020 against a real broker's 0.464. Anything depending on the open (gap trades, overnight holds, next-bar entries) is invalid on such data. Also detects frozen zero-range bars, duplicate and out-of-order timestamps, and bars whose high/low do not bracket open/close. Returns BROKER-GRADE, SUSPECT or INDICATIVE with the numbers behind it. Use this BEFORE trusting any backtest built on the data.

    Annotations the server declares

    • title: Is this price data real? (free)
    • readOnlyHint: true
    • destructiveHint: false
    • openWorldHint: false
  • clusteredtYour t-stat assumes independence; your trades cluster.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
    • The server marks it read-only (readOnlyHint: true), but an annotation never lowers a class.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Your t-stat assumes independence; your trades cluster. Use when your trades are not independent — several in the same day, the same regime, or a correlated basket. A t-stat computed as if every trade were an independent draw is inflated; in this repo the factor was about 1.9x. Give per-trade returns and their dates; returns the naive t, the date-cluster RUNS NOW: served from a daily free allowance (250 left today), then $0.25 USDC on Base via x402. No account, no API key. Example request: {"returns": [0.4, -1.1, 0.8, 1.2, -0.6, 0.3, -0.2, 0.9, -1.4, 0.7, 0.5, -0.3, 1.1, -0.8, 0.2, 0.6, -0.5, 0.4, 0.9, -0.7], "dates": ["2024-01-02", "2024-01-02", "2024-01-03", "2024-01-03", "2024-01-04", "2024-01-05", "202

    Annotations the server declares

    • title: Money Mind — Clustered t
    • readOnlyHint: true
    • destructiveHint: false
    • openWorldHint: false
  • correlationReal relationship, or two autocorrelated series drifting together.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
    • The server marks it read-only (readOnlyHint: true), but an annotation never lowers a class.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Real relationship, or two autocorrelated series drifting together. Real relationship, or two autocorrelated series drifting together RUNS NOW: served from a daily free allowance (250 left today), then $0.31 USDC on Base via x402. No account, no API key. Example request: {"x": [0.4, -1.1, 0.8, 1.2, -0.6, 0.3, -0.2, 0.9, -1.4, 0.7, 0.5, -0.3], "y": [0.3, -0.9, 0.6, 1.0, -0.7, 0.1, -0.4, 0.8, -1.2, 0.5, 0.6, -0.1]}

    Annotations the server declares

    • title: Money Mind — Spurious Correlation
    • readOnlyHint: true
    • destructiveHint: false
    • openWorldHint: false
  • deflatedsharpeIs this Sharpe real, or the best of N tries?No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
    • The server marks it read-only (readOnlyHint: true), but an annotation never lowers a class.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Is this Sharpe real, or the best of N tries? Deflated for the search you ran. Is this Sharpe real, or the best of N tries? Deflated for the search you ran RUNS NOW: served from a daily free allowance (250 left today), then $0.31 USDC on Base via x402. No account, no API key. Example request: {"returns": [0.012, -0.004, 0.021, 0.003, -0.011, 0.017, 0.006, -0.008, 0.014, 0.002, -0.006, 0.019, 0.001, -0.013, 0.009, 0.004], "n_trials": 40}

    Annotations the server declares

    • title: Money Mind — Deflated Sharpe
    • readOnlyHint: true
    • destructiveHint: false
    • openWorldHint: false
  • drawdownIs this drawdown a broken strategy or a normal bad patch, vs your own shuffled returns.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
    • The server marks it read-only (readOnlyHint: true), but an annotation never lowers a class.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Is this drawdown a broken strategy or a normal bad patch, vs your own shuffled returns. Is this drawdown a broken strategy or a normal bad patch, vs your own shuffled returns RUNS NOW: served from a daily free allowance (250 left today), then $0.31 USDC on Base via x402. No account, no API key. Example request: {"returns": [0.9, -1.0, 0.4, -1.0, 1.6, -1.0, 0.7, 0.3, -1.0, 2.1, -1.0, -1.0, 0.8, 1.4, -1.0, 0.5, -1.0, 1.9, 0.2, -1.0, 1.1, -1.0, 0.6, 1.3]}

    Annotations the server declares

    • title: Money Mind — Drawdown Check
    • readOnlyHint: true
    • destructiveHint: false
    • openWorldHint: false
  • factcheckVerify a claim against 2-4 source URLs: cited passages, cross-source agreement, verdict: consistent | conflicting | insufficient_evidence.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
    • The server marks it read-only (readOnlyHint: true), but an annotation never lowers a class.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Verify a claim against 2-4 source URLs: cited passages, cross-source agreement, verdict: consistent | conflicting | insufficient_evidence. Evidence, not truth. Use when your agent needs to verify a claim against independent sources before acting on it. Give a claim plus 2-4 source URLs; each source is extracted (three-fetch cross-check, confidence-scored), the checkable figures are compared across sources, and you get the cited passages plus a verdict: con PAID: $0.03 USDC on Base via x402. Call it to receive the payment challenge. Example request: {"claim": "Acme Corp revenue was $4.2 billion in 2025", "urls": ["https://example.com", "https://example.org"]}

    Annotations the server declares

    • title: Money Mind — Fact Check: verify a claim against sources
    • readOnlyHint: true
    • destructiveHint: false
    • openWorldHint: true
  • judge-batchTriage up to 1,000 backtests in one call: the best-of-N multiple-testing selection correction over every return series — $0.01 per series, survivors ranked best-first.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
    • The server marks it read-only (readOnlyHint: true), but an annotation never lowers a class.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Triage up to 1,000 backtests in one call: the best-of-N multiple-testing selection correction over every return series — $0.01 per series, survivors ranked best-first. Use when your agent has a FARM of backtests, strategies, or research results — dozens to a thousand — and needs triage, not one-by-one verdicts. One call runs the selection correction over every series: each gets NO (killed), PROVISIONAL (survived this gate), or ERROR (malformed). Results ranked sur PAID: $0.01 USDC on Base via x402. Call it to receive the payment challenge. Example request: {"series": [{"returns": [0.8, -0.3, 1.2, 0.5, -0.6, 0.9, 0.4, -0.2, 1.1, 0.7, -0.4, 0.6, 0.3, -0.5, 1.0, 0.8, -0.1, 0.5, 0.9, -0.3], "n_tested": 20, "label": "weak"}, {"returns": [2.0, 2.1, 1.9, 2.2, 2.0, 2.1, 1.8, 2.0,

    Annotations the server declares

    • title: Money Mind — Judge Batch: backtest triage
    • readOnlyHint: true
    • destructiveHint: false
    • openWorldHint: false
  • judge-liteIs this backtest, strategy or DeFi result real, or the luckiest of N tries?No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
    • The server marks it read-only (readOnlyHint: true), but an annotation never lowers a class.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Is this backtest, strategy or DeFi result real, or the luckiest of N tries? Three gates in one verdict — multiple-testing selection, deflated Sharpe, date-clustered t — built for trading agents. Use when your agent has a backtest, a research result, or any return series that looks good — and needs to know whether it is real or the luckiest of N tries before spending money on it. One call runs the three cheapest high-signal gates: selection correction (family-wise p across your declared n_te PAID: $0.05 USDC on Base via x402. Call it to receive the payment challenge. Example request: {"returns": [0.8, -0.3, 1.2, 0.5, -0.6, 0.9, 0.4, -0.2, 1.1, 0.7, -0.4, 0.6, 0.3, -0.5, 1.0, 0.8, -0.1, 0.5, 0.9, -0.3], "n_tested": 20, "dates": ["2024-06-03", "2024-06-03", "2024-06-04", "2024-06-04", "2024-06-05", "20

    Annotations the server declares

    • title: Money Mind — Judge Lite: backtest verdict in three gates
    • readOnlyHint: true
    • destructiveHint: false
    • openWorldHint: false
  • judge-nanoIs this backtest winner real, or just the best of N tries?No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
    • The server marks it read-only (readOnlyHint: true), but an annotation never lowers a class.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Is this backtest winner real, or just the best of N tries? The multiple-testing selection correction (family-wise p) in one $0.01 call — verdict NO or PROVISIONAL. Use when your agent has a backtest winner, a research result, or any return series that looks good — and needs the cheapest possible check on whether it is real or the luckiest of N tries. One call runs the selection correction: the family-wise p of the series' own t across your declared n_tested. V PAID: $0.01 USDC on Base via x402. Call it to receive the payment challenge. Example request: {"returns": [0.8, -0.3, 1.2, 0.5, -0.6, 0.9, 0.4, -0.2, 1.1, 0.7, -0.4, 0.6, 0.3, -0.5, 1.0, 0.8, -0.1, 0.5, 0.9, -0.3], "n_tested": 20}

    Annotations the server declares

    • title: Money Mind — Judge Nano: is this backtest winner real?
    • readOnlyHint: true
    • destructiveHint: false
    • openWorldHint: false
  • multipletestYou tested N strategies and kept the best; is it noise.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
    • The server marks it read-only (readOnlyHint: true), but an annotation never lowers a class.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    You tested N strategies and kept the best; is it noise. Use when you searched many strategies or parameter sets and kept the best one. Quoting that winner's solo p-value is the most common way a backtest lies. Give the number of things you tested and the winner's t-statistic; returns the family-wise p-value, the t you actually needed, and the t that pure RUNS NOW: served from a daily free allowance (250 left today), then $0.20 USDC on Base via x402. No account, no API key. Example request: {"n_tested": 1000, "best_t": 3.0}

    Annotations the server declares

    • title: Money Mind — Multiple Testing
    • readOnlyHint: true
    • destructiveHint: false
    • openWorldHint: false
  • referee11-gate adjudication of a trading signal series.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
    • The server marks it read-only (readOnlyHint: true), but an annotation never lowers a class.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    11-gate adjudication of a trading signal series. Use when you have OHLC bars and a -1/0/1 signal series and need to know whether a backtest result is real or an artefact. Applies 11 gates most backtests fail: matched random-entry drift control, date-clustered standard errors, entry at the next bar's open, events-not-fills, absolute (not just exces PAID: $5.00 USDC on Base via x402. Call it to receive the payment challenge. Example request: {"bars": {"EURUSD": [{"time": "2024-01-01T00:00:00Z", "open": 1.0995, "high": 1.1001, "low": 1.0986, "close": 1.0992}, {"time": "2024-01-01T01:00:00Z", "open": 1.1002, "high": 1.1012, "low": 1.0996, "close": 1.1006}, {"t

    Annotations the server declares

    • title: Money Mind — Referee
    • readOnlyHint: true
    • destructiveHint: false
    • openWorldHint: false
  • regimeDid the process change, or is recent weakness inside normal variation.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
    • The server marks it read-only (readOnlyHint: true), but an annotation never lowers a class.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Did the process change, or is recent weakness inside normal variation. Did the process change, or is recent weakness inside normal variation RUNS NOW: served from a daily free allowance (250 left today), then $0.31 USDC on Base via x402. No account, no API key. Example request: {"returns": [0.9, -1.0, 0.4, -1.0, 1.6, -1.0, 0.7, 0.3, -1.0, 2.1, -1.0, -1.0, 0.8, 1.4, -1.0, 0.5, -1.0, 1.9, 0.2, -1.0, 1.1, -1.0, 0.6, 1.3, -0.8, 1.5]}

    Annotations the server declares

    • title: Money Mind — Regime Break
    • readOnlyHint: true
    • destructiveHint: false
    • openWorldHint: false
  • samplesizeHow many observations before this test can answer anything — ask before you spend.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
    • The server marks it read-only (readOnlyHint: true), but an annotation never lowers a class.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    How many observations before this test can answer anything — ask before you spend. How many observations before this test can answer anything — ask before you spend RUNS NOW: served from a daily free allowance (250 left today), then $0.31 USDC on Base via x402. No account, no API key. Example request: {"baseline_rate": 0.08, "min_detectable_effect": 0.2, "power": 0.8, "alpha": 0.05}

    Annotations the server declares

    • title: Money Mind — Sample Size
    • readOnlyHint: true
    • destructiveHint: false
    • openWorldHint: false
Only reads 1Claude Code: allow
  • v1_extractFetch a web page three independent ways (rendered, static, second-render cross-check), confidence-scored, with a tamper-evident attestation.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • The description's first verb is "fetch": a word for reading.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Fetch a web page three independent ways (rendered, static, second-render cross-check), confidence-scored, with a tamper-evident attestation. Refuses protected, login and CAPTCHA pages without charging. Use when your agent needs web content it cannot fetch itself — JavaScript-rendered pages, static pages, or paginated listings — and needs to show its principal the evidence. Every extraction runs three independent fetches (rendered, static, second-render cross-check), is confidence-scored, and is wr RUNS NOW: served from a daily free allowance (25 left today), then $0.02 USDC on Base via x402. No account, no API key. Example request: {"url": "https://example.com", "extraction_target": "the page title and the body text"}

    Annotations the server declares

    • title: Money Mind — Web Extraction, cross-checked 3 ways
    • readOnlyHint: true
    • destructiveHint: false
    • openWorldHint: true

This is not a safety rating, and no finding is not a safety guarantee. The groups and findings come from fixed checks of the tool definitions the server returned on the date shown, not from its code or what it does when called. How the checks work.

Install

Pinned to version 1.0.0. Values in angle brackets are yours to fill in.

claude mcp add --transport http money-mind https://money-mind-extract.onrender.com/mcp

Run in a terminal.

Claude Code permissions

Allow the reads, ask before a change, deny the deletes. Paste into .claude/settings.json.

.claude/settings.json
{
  "permissions": {
    "allow": [
      "mcp__money-mind__v1_extract"
    ],
    "ask": [
      "mcp__money-mind__check_price_data",
      "mcp__money-mind__check_eval_selection",
      "mcp__money-mind__factcheck",
      "mcp__money-mind__referee",
      "mcp__money-mind__multipletest",
      "mcp__money-mind__clusteredt",
      "mcp__money-mind__deflatedsharpe",
      "mcp__money-mind__abtest",
      "mcp__money-mind__samplesize",
      "mcp__money-mind__drawdown",
      "mcp__money-mind__correlation",
      "mcp__money-mind__regime",
      "mcp__money-mind__judge-batch",
      "mcp__money-mind__judge-nano",
      "mcp__money-mind__judge-lite",
      "mcp__money-mind__audit"
    ],
    "deny": []
  }
}

Tools that only read are allowed, tools that change things ask first, tools that delete or cancel are denied. It assumes the server is installed as money-mind. Review it before you use it.