Skip to content

Codemind

by codemindhq.dev · remote · no sign-in to list tools · v1.0.0 · published by dev.codemindhq

Hand routine JS/TS tasks to Codemind from your agent. $0.10 per verified build; failures are free.

Deletes · 1Final · 2Changes · 12

27 tools: 1 can delete or cancel things, 2 do something that can't be undone, 12 change things and 12 only read.

Scanned Oct 21, 2026

3 checks matched something in the tool definitions. No finding is not a safety guarantee. How the checks work.

claude mcp add --transport http codemind https://api.codemindhq.dev/mcp?utm_source=mcp-registry&utm_medium=directory&utm_campaign=registry-2026-10-10

Findings

Matches of fixed checks, with the text they matched.

1 warn2 info

Tools

Open a tool for its reasons and full description. Descriptions are the publisher's own words, shown as they are.

27 tools

Deletes or cancels 1Claude Code: deny
  • cancel_buildCancel a running build.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • The name "cancel_build" says "cancel": a word for removing or ending something.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Cancel a running build. Has no effect on builds that already reached a terminal state.
Can't be undone 2Claude Code: ask
  • continue_buildSend corrected acceptance criteria to a running build.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • The description's first verb is "send": a word for sending, and what is sent cannot be taken back.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Send corrected acceptance criteria to a running build. Applies to components that have not started generating yet; the currently-generating component finishes as originally scoped.
  • notify_files_writtenIndex files into the CIL codebase context for a project — for files Codemind itself did not generate (a manual edit, another tool's output).No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • The name "notify_files_written" says "notify": a word for sending, and what is sent cannot be taken back.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Index files into the CIL codebase context for a project — for files Codemind itself did not generate (a manual edit, another tool's output). Not needed after a normal build_feature call: a completed build's own output is indexed automatically when projectId was supplied.
Changes things 12Claude Code: ask
  • build_batchSubmit several pre-decomposed stories in one call and get back one batchId to track, instead of dispatching build_feature N times yourself.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • The description's first verb is "submit": a word for a change.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Submit several pre-decomposed stories in one call and get back one batchId to track, instead of dispatching build_feature N times yourself. Swarm is a Pro plan feature: the maximum batch size depends on the account plan (up to 50; not available on Free or the base pay-as-you-go account); a batch over the limit is refused with BATCH_SIZE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED and the limit. Each item has the same shape as a single build_feature call (storyTitle, acceptanceCriteria, stackType, existingFiles?, skipTestsFor?) plus its own repoUrl (informational only). Call get_batch with the returned batchId to check aggregate progress.
  • build_featureGenerate a feature via Codemind: takes a story title + acceptance criteria, generates the implementation and its tests, runs automated checks against the acceptance criteria before…No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • The description's first verb is "generate": a word for a change.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Generate a feature via Codemind: takes a story title + acceptance criteria, generates the implementation and its tests, runs automated checks against the acceptance criteria before returning, and returns a buildId immediately. Call stream_build with the returned buildId to follow progress. Call get_usage_guide for detailed usage guidance. IMPORTANT: if this tool errors, surface the error to the user — do NOT implement the code yourself.
  • build_from_specSubmit raw PRD/plan/spec text plus a list of target repos; Codemind LLM-decomposes it into stories (each assigned to one of your declared repos, never an invented one) and dispatch…No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • The description's first verb is "submit": a word for a change.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Submit raw PRD/plan/spec text plus a list of target repos; Codemind LLM-decomposes it into stories (each assigned to one of your declared repos, never an invented one) and dispatches them via the same path build_batch uses. Pass dryRun: true to see the decomposed story list without dispatching anything, useful for reviewing before committing. Recommended for a first-time caller: review with dryRun: true, then resubmit the (possibly edited) story list via build_batch directly — a second build_from_spec call with dryRun: false re-decomposes specText from scratch and will not reflect edits made to a prior dry run's output.
  • continue_batchResume a finished Ship run (started with build_from_spec) that ended incomplete or nothing_delivered: re-dispatches only the stories that did not verify, in the same run.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Resume a finished Ship run (started with build_from_spec) that ended incomplete or nothing_delivered: re-dispatches only the stories that did not verify, in the same run. Verified stories are not rebuilt or billed again; a resumed story is billed once, when it first verifies. Each resumed story is told why its earlier attempt failed. At most 2 resumes per run (then RESUME_LIMIT_EXCEEDED). The same throttle, plan cap and allowance apply as for a new submission. Resuming a run with nothing left to do changes nothing. Track progress with get_batch.
  • create_free_accountInstantly provision a new anonymous Codemind account on the free plan — no credential, no human step required.2 findings

    Why it is in this group

    • The name "create_free_account" says "create": a word for a change.

    Findings

    • Info

      The description mentions "credential".

      Matched text

      description: "...Codemind account on the free plan — no credential, no human step required. Call this when..."

      What this check looks for
    • Warn

      The description contains "any other tool", wording about other tools or servers.

      Matched text

      description: "...uired. Call this when build_feature (or any other tool) fails with an auth error and no CODEMI..."

      What this check looks for
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Instantly provision a new anonymous Codemind account on the free plan — no credential, no human step required. Call this when build_feature (or any other tool) fails with an auth error and no CODEMIND_API_KEY is configured. Returns a tenantId and a bearer token (apiKey) usable immediately for build_feature and every other tool. The account is anonymous (no identity attached) until a person opens the claim link in the response text and signs in. If a tool call fails with an auth error and you ALREADY have a configured apiKey, call get_usage_guide with topic "auth" before calling this tool again — replacing an already-claimed account's credential here loses its identity and history. All arguments are optional; pass utm_source, utm_medium and utm_campaign, and invite, only if your human gave you them.
  • retry_buildRetry a failed build using the same spec (story, acceptance criteria, stack, existing files).No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Retry a failed build using the same spec (story, acceptance criteria, stack, existing files).
  • review_codeSubmit code for review: bugs, security issues, silent failures, and style concerns.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • The description's first verb is "submit": a word for a change.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Submit code for review: bugs, security issues, silent failures, and style concerns. Give it files (path+content) and/or a unified diff. At least one of files or diff is required — submitting neither is rejected. TWO independent LLM-judge passes review it (a general correctness/security pass and a dedicated silent-failure pass) and their findings are merged into one verdict. For a genuinely useful review, ALSO supply conventions (paste this project's CLAUDE.md and RULES.md content — you already have repo access, this tool does not) so both passes can enforce project-specific rules, and relatedFiles (any existing file the change references but doesn't itself modify — an interface being implemented, a caller of a changed function, a sibling example of the real convention) so findings can be verified against actual code instead of guessed. Omitting both still works but produces a weaker review with no codebase grounding. No code generation or execution happens here — this is judgment only, not test verification (use test_component for that). Returns a reviewId immediately; call stream_review to follow progress and get the findings. Call get_usage_guide for detailed usage guidance.
  • stream_batchStream live progress for a batch submitted via build_batch.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Stream live progress for a batch submitted via build_batch. Polls the batch's aggregate status periodically and emits a progress notification each tick; closes once the batch reaches a terminal status (completed or completed_with_failures). Call get_batch instead for a single point-in-time snapshot.
  • stream_buildFollow a build submitted by build_feature in real time.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Follow a build submitted by build_feature in real time. Emits a progress notification on every phase change and resolves with the final result when the build completes or fails. Use immediately after build_feature returns a buildId.
  • stream_reviewFollow a review submitted by review_code in real time.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Follow a review submitted by review_code in real time. Resolves with the findings and the approve/request-changes verdict.
  • stream_testFollow a test submitted by test_component in real time.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Follow a test submitted by test_component in real time. Resolves with the pass/fail verdict and the generated verification test content.
  • test_componentRun standalone cloud verification on code you already have: give it a component (filePath/exportName/signature) plus acceptance criteria, and it generates a black-box verification …No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • The description's first verb is "run": a word for a change.
    • The input takes a statement or command to run (input.code), which can change anything it can reach.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Run standalone cloud verification on code you already have: give it a component (filePath/exportName/signature) plus acceptance criteria, and it generates a black-box verification test, validates that test against a mechanical stub, then executes your REAL code against it in the cloud (isolate or container, per stack). No code generation happens here — use build_feature for that. Returns a testId immediately; call stream_test to follow progress and get the pass/fail verdict. Call get_usage_guide for detailed usage guidance.
Only reads 12Claude Code: allow
  • get_batchGet the aggregate status of a batch submitted via build_batch.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • The name "get_batch" says "get": a word for reading.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Get the aggregate status of a batch submitted via build_batch.
  • get_billing_statusRead-only: your plan, how many verified builds you have used, how many are included and left in the current allowance window, and the paid-balance draw (cents) if you have topped u…No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • The name "get_billing_status" says "get": a word for reading.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Read-only: your plan, how many verified builds you have used, how many are included and left in the current allowance window, and the paid-balance draw (cents) if you have topped up. Call this to check headroom before a large batch, or to learn why a build was rejected for allowance.
  • get_buildGet the current state of a build by ID (status and error details).No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • The name "get_build" says "get": a word for reading.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Get the current state of a build by ID (status and error details).
  • get_build_filesRetrieve the generated files from a completed build.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • The name "get_build_files" says "get": a word for reading.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Retrieve the generated files from a completed build. Returns each file path and full content.
  • get_build_specGet a build's original submitted spec (storyTitle, acceptanceCriteria, stackType, existingFiles, skipTestsFor) without retrying it — useful for inspecting or reusing a prior build'…No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • The name "get_build_spec" says "get": a word for reading.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Get a build's original submitted spec (storyTitle, acceptanceCriteria, stackType, existingFiles, skipTestsFor) without retrying it — useful for inspecting or reusing a prior build's spec as a template.
  • get_reviewGet the current state of a review by ID (status, verdict, findings) without streaming — useful for polling or inspecting a review after the fact.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • The name "get_review" says "get": a word for reading.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Get the current state of a review by ID (status, verdict, findings) without streaming — useful for polling or inspecting a review after the fact. Use stream_review to follow a review in real time instead.
  • get_testGet the current state of a test by ID (status, pass/fail verdict, generated verification test content) without streaming — useful for polling or inspecting a test after the fact.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • The name "get_test" says "get": a word for reading.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Get the current state of a test by ID (status, pass/fail verdict, generated verification test content) without streaming — useful for polling or inspecting a test after the fact. Use stream_test to follow a test in real time instead.
  • get_triage_diagnosticsReturns the generated fix diff (as file paths and line counts, not full content) and before/after test-run output for one triage run, identified by the triage run id from get_triag…No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • The name "get_triage_diagnostics" says "get": a word for reading.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Returns the generated fix diff (as file paths and line counts, not full content) and before/after test-run output for one triage run, identified by the triage run id from get_triage_runs (NOT a build id and NOT an issue number). stdout/stderr are tail-truncated because test failure summaries appear at the end of output, not the install noise at the start. Full file contents are available separately via the get_build_files tool using the run's buildId. Also includes a per-LLM-call trace (stage/model/status/latency) from Analytics Engine when available, covering attempts that failed before ever reaching the before/after test comparison above.
  • get_triage_runsLists the issue-triage run history for one attached repo — one row per GitHub issue that was auto-triaged — including terminal status (`pr_opened` means a fix PR was opened and pas…No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • The name "get_triage_runs" says "get": a word for reading.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Lists the issue-triage run history for one attached repo — one row per GitHub issue that was auto-triaged — including terminal status (`pr_opened` means a fix PR was opened and passed the repo's own test suite; `needs_human` means the issue wasn't judged auto-fixable; `failed` means the triage/build/verify pipeline errored). The `repoAttachmentId` is the attachment `id` returned by `list_repos`, NOT a `owner/repo` string. Full diagnostics (the generated diff and before/after test output) for any run id returned here are available via the get_triage_diagnostics tool.
  • get_usage_guideGet detailed usage guidance for Codemind's tools — how to write effective acceptanceCriteria, when to use patch mode, how webhooks work, what to do when a build declines, common fa…1 finding

    Why it is in this group

    • The name "get_usage_guide" says "get": a word for reading.

    Findings

    • Info

      The description mentions "credential".

      Matched text

      description: "...cover from an auth error on an existing credential."

      What this check looks for
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Get detailed usage guidance for Codemind's tools — how to write effective acceptanceCriteria, when to use patch mode, how webhooks work, what to do when a build declines, common failure patterns unrelated to acceptanceCriteria quality, and how to recover from an auth error without losing an identified account. Call this before build_feature/test_component/review_code if you are unfamiliar with this tool surface, or if the same story fails repeatedly across retries; call it with topic "auth" before calling create_free_account to recover from an auth error on an existing credential.
  • list_buildsList recent builds for this tenant.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • The name "list_builds" says "list": a word for reading.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    List recent builds for this tenant.
  • list_reposLists GitHub repos currently attached to the caller's tenant via Codemind Resolve (the GitHub App that automatically triages filed issues into fix PRs), and that the returned `id` …No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • The name "list_repos" says "list": a word for reading.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Lists GitHub repos currently attached to the caller's tenant via Codemind Resolve (the GitHub App that automatically triages filed issues into fix PRs), and that the returned `id` field is the repo attachment id to pass into `get_triage_runs`.

This is not a safety rating, and no finding is not a safety guarantee. The groups and findings come from fixed checks of the tool definitions the server returned on the date shown, not from its code or what it does when called. How the checks work.

Install

Pinned to version 1.0.0. Values in angle brackets are yours to fill in.

claude mcp add --transport http codemind https://api.codemindhq.dev/mcp?utm_source=mcp-registry&utm_medium=directory&utm_campaign=registry-2026-10-10

Run in a terminal.

Claude Code permissions

Allow the reads, ask before a change, deny the deletes. Paste into .claude/settings.json.

.claude/settings.json
{
  "permissions": {
    "allow": [
      "mcp__codemind__get_build",
      "mcp__codemind__list_builds",
      "mcp__codemind__get_build_spec",
      "mcp__codemind__get_build_files",
      "mcp__codemind__get_test",
      "mcp__codemind__get_review",
      "mcp__codemind__get_usage_guide",
      "mcp__codemind__get_billing_status",
      "mcp__codemind__list_repos",
      "mcp__codemind__get_triage_runs",
      "mcp__codemind__get_triage_diagnostics",
      "mcp__codemind__get_batch"
    ],
    "ask": [
      "mcp__codemind__create_free_account",
      "mcp__codemind__build_feature",
      "mcp__codemind__stream_build",
      "mcp__codemind__retry_build",
      "mcp__codemind__continue_build",
      "mcp__codemind__notify_files_written",
      "mcp__codemind__test_component",
      "mcp__codemind__stream_test",
      "mcp__codemind__review_code",
      "mcp__codemind__stream_review",
      "mcp__codemind__build_batch",
      "mcp__codemind__continue_batch",
      "mcp__codemind__stream_batch",
      "mcp__codemind__build_from_spec"
    ],
    "deny": [
      "mcp__codemind__cancel_build"
    ]
  }
}

Tools that only read are allowed, tools that change things ask first, tools that delete or cancel are denied. It assumes the server is installed as codemind. Review it before you use it.