Skip to content

Stablecoin Scanner

by achivx.com · remote · no sign-in to list tools · v1.4.0 · published by com.achivx

Stablecoin risk for agents: freezes, OFAC, exposure, allowances, transfers, graph. 7 chains.

Changes · 1

8 tools: 1 change things and 7 only read.

Scanned Oct 21, 2026

2 checks matched something in the tool definitions. No finding is not a safety guarantee. How the checks work.

claude mcp add --transport http stablescan https://stablescan.achivx.com/mcp

Findings

Matches of fixed checks, with the text they matched.

1 warn1 info
  • The server marks "get_address_approvals" read-only (readOnlyHint: true), and its own name, description or input give the class "write".

    Matched text

    annotations: {"readOnlyHint":true,"destructiveHint":false,"idempotentHint":true,"openWorldHint":true}; The name "get_address_approvals" says "get": a word for reading.

    What this check looks for
  • The description is 2,898 characters long, over the 2,000 this check looks for.

    Matched text

    description ends: "...h or sanctioned node missing from those days is not evidence that there was none."

    What this check looks for

Tools

Open a tool for its reasons and full description. Descriptions are the publisher's own words, shown as they are.

8 tools

Changes things 1Claude Code: ask
  • get_address_approvalsOpen ERC-20 and Permit2 allowances one address has granted on one chain, one row per spender and token with the raw value, unlimited/oversized/old flags, spender_class and a band (…1 finding

    Why it is in this group

    • The name "get_address_approvals" says "get": a word for reading.
    • The description's first verb is "open": a word for a change.
    • The server marks it read-only (readOnlyHint: true), but an annotation never lowers a class.

    Findings

    • Warn

      The server marks "get_address_approvals" read-only (readOnlyHint: true), and its own name, description or input give the class "write".

      Matched text

      annotations: {"readOnlyHint":true,"destructiveHint":false,"idempotentHint":true,"openWorldHint":true}; The name "get_address_approvals" says "get": a word for reading.

      What this check looks for
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Open ERC-20 and Permit2 allowances one address has granted on one chain, one row per spender and token with the raw value, unlimited/oversized/old flags, spender_class and a band (critical|high|low|expired|none): unlimited to a flagged or unknown spender is the main drain vector, a known service spender (DEX router, Permit2) is normal, an expired Permit2 sub-allowance reads 'expired'. Use it when the question is what a wallet has approved and who could pull its stablecoins. Not for a risk tier — the band is informational and never moves get_address_risk. Not for issuer freezes: get_address_compliance. Not for taint: get_address_exposure. address is the allowance owner (the granter), never the spender. Heavy read: under load it answers busy or timeout — retry with backoff. No auth; 1200 requests/min shared by all tools. A heuristic band over decoded on-chain Approval facts, not an AML or legal determination.

    Annotations the server declares

    • destructiveHint: false
    • idempotentHint: true
    • openWorldHint: true
    • readOnlyHint: true
Only reads 7Claude Code: allow
  • get_address_complianceIssuer freeze/seize facts for one address on one chain, plus the OFAC SDN flag: freeze[] (one row per freeze-capable stablecoin, status frozen|seized|clear|unknown, with frozen_usd…No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • The name "get_address_compliance" says "get": a word for reading.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Issuer freeze/seize facts for one address on one chain, plus the OFAC SDN flag: freeze[] (one row per freeze-capable stablecoin, status frozen|seized|clear|unknown, with frozen_usd6 = the balance locked now where it was read), not_freezable[] (stablecoins whose issuer cannot freeze on this chain, e.g. the Binance-Peg wrappers on BNB Chain — enforcement is off-chain), frozen_elsewhere[] (the same address bytes under a standing freeze on another indexed chain; EVM and Tron share them, Solana never) and freeze_proposals[] (issuer multisig proposals naming the address, USDT on Ethereum and Tron: executed ones; pending ones only where the operator publishes them in full — elsewhere a pending proposal's address is shown once it executes). Use it when the question is whether an issuer or OFAC acted on this address, or how much is frozen. Not for a risk tier: get_address_risk. Not for taint distance: get_address_exposure. Not for when the OFAC list was refreshed: get_sanctions_status. Decoded on-chain issuer acts with provenance, no heuristics. 'unknown' means no act names the address and that pair's freeze history is not fully backfilled yet — absence of evidence is not 'not frozen'; an empty frozen_elsewhere[] or freeze_proposals[] means none in what is indexed, not clean everywhere. Each chain is its own issuer act: pass chain to ask Ethereum or Tron about the same bytes, chains_with_data says where. Heavy read: under load it answers busy or timeout — retry with backoff. No auth; 1200 requests/min shared by all tools. Not an identity, AML or legal determination.

    Annotations the server declares

    • destructiveHint: false
    • idempotentHint: true
    • openWorldHint: true
    • readOnlyHint: true
  • get_address_exposureTaint exposure of one address on one chain: a bounded backward walk over the value graph to the nearest OFAC-sanctioned or hack/drainer/mixer root, answered as a class (sanctioned|…No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • The name "get_address_exposure" says "get": a word for reading.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Taint exposure of one address on one chain: a bounded backward walk over the value graph to the nearest OFAC-sanctioned or hack/drainer/mixer root, answered as a class (sanctioned|direct|indirect|negligible|unknown|none), the nearest hop and a value-proportional haircut fraction. Use it to explain how closely an address is tied to a sanctioned or hack root and by how much value. Not for one go/no-go tier — get_address_risk already includes this walk. Not for the counterparties themselves or a chosen depth, token or window: get_wallet_graph_walk. Not for issuer freezes: get_address_compliance. 'unknown' means the walk did not complete — OFAC list unloaded, time_budget, frontier_cap, Solana coverage pending or partial, short history, or no hack/drainer/mixer label loaded for this chain — never a false 'none'; incomplete_reasons names which (time_budget may complete at a quieter moment, frontier_cap repeats). Depth is fixed at 3 hops and the walk never crosses chains: ask again with chain set for each network in chains_with_data. A verdict is reused for up to 60 s (10 s after a time_budget cut). Heavy read: under load it answers busy or timeout — retry with backoff. No auth; 1200 requests/min shared by all tools. A heuristic signal, not an AML or legal determination.

    Annotations the server declares

    • destructiveHint: false
    • idempotentHint: true
    • openWorldHint: true
    • readOnlyHint: true
  • get_address_riskUnified risk tier for one address on one chain — unknown|none|low|medium|high|severe — from decoded facts (OFAC listing, issuer freeze/seize on this chain, exposure to a sanctioned…No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • The name "get_address_risk" says "get": a word for reading.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Unified risk tier for one address on one chain — unknown|none|low|medium|high|severe — from decoded facts (OFAC listing, issuer freeze/seize on this chain, exposure to a sanctioned or hack root) and attributed labels with provenance (labels alone cap at medium; a lone-source accusation adds no tier). Use it for one go/no-go read before accepting or sending funds. Not for freeze proposals, frozen balances or a freeze on another chain (frozen_elsewhere): get_address_compliance. Not for taint hops or the haircut: get_address_exposure. Not for open allowances: get_address_approvals. 'unknown' means the check did not finish, never 'checked clean'; evidence and incomplete_reasons name the cause (e.g. time_budget: the exposure walk was cut, a quieter moment may complete it). The freeze input is this chain's per-token status alone: frozen/seized argues for high (not a row with own_token_contract: the issuer's act on its own token contract), and an 'unknown' status or a pair whose freeze history is not backfilled turns a would-be 'none' into 'unknown' — so a Solana tier, where every freeze pair is unknown, is never 'none'. The exposure walk behind the tier is fixed at 3 hops; pick depth and window with get_wallet_graph_walk. A verdict is reused for up to 60 s (10 s after a time_budget cut). Heavy read: under load it answers busy or timeout — retry with backoff. No auth; 1200 requests/min shared by all tools. Not an identity, AML or legal determination.

    Annotations the server declares

    • destructiveHint: false
    • idempotentHint: true
    • openWorldHint: true
    • readOnlyHint: true
  • get_recent_transactionsRecent stablecoin transfers on one chain, newest first, filterable by payer and/or recipient, cursor-paginated.No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • The name "get_recent_transactions" says "get": a word for reading.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Recent stablecoin transfers on one chain, newest first, filterable by payer and/or recipient, cursor-paginated. Use it for the latest transfers of an address or of the whole chain, with a tx_hash to cite. Not for who an address settles with over time: get_wallet_graph_walk. Not for how fresh the feed is: get_sync_status. Not for any verdict about an address: get_address_risk. Answer: items[], each row tx_hash, log_index, block_number, block_time (RFC 3339), payer, recipient, amount {amount (minor units, string), decimals, token (symbol)}, token (the contract address), finality, and usd_amount where priced. The chain is the one asked for — rows do not repeat it. payer and recipient narrow together; omit both for the chain-wide feed; pass next_cursor back unchanged as cursor for older rows, and a page without it is the last. Heavy read: under load it answers busy or timeout — retry with backoff. No auth; 1200 requests/min shared by all tools. Plain on-chain Transfer facts, no scoring.

    Annotations the server declares

    • destructiveHint: false
    • idempotentHint: true
    • openWorldHint: true
    • readOnlyHint: true
  • get_sanctions_statusOFAC SDN list coverage as this scanner holds it: evm_count, solana_count, tron_count and total addresses loaded (the free public 0xB10C list of US-Government public-domain data), u…No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • The name "get_sanctions_status" says "get": a word for reading.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    OFAC SDN list coverage as this scanner holds it: evm_count, solana_count, tron_count and total addresses loaded (the free public 0xB10C list of US-Government public-domain data), updated_at of the last refresh (null until the first ingest) and the source. Use it to date the sanctions input behind a verdict, or to tell a clear OFAC flag from an unloaded list. Not for whether one address is listed: get_address_compliance (the flag) or get_address_risk (the tier). Not for indexer freshness: get_sync_status. No parameters; one answer covers every chain. Light read, never waits for a slot. No auth; 1200 requests/min shared by all tools. Verify against the official SDN list before acting on it; not legal advice.

    Annotations the server declares

    • destructiveHint: false
    • idempotentHint: true
    • openWorldHint: true
    • readOnlyHint: true
  • get_sync_statusIndexer freshness for one chain: freshness_seconds (the age of the newest indexed transfer; null when it could not be read for this answer), the indexer's head and finalized blocks…No findings

    Why it is in this group

    • The name "get_sync_status" says "get": a word for reading.
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Indexer freshness for one chain: freshness_seconds (the age of the newest indexed transfer; null when it could not be read for this answer), the indexer's head and finalized blocks, its safe block and its lag in blocks (lag_blocks = head_block - last_indexed_block). Use it before trusting how recent an address answer is, or to tell an empty feed from a stalled indexer. Not for how fresh the OFAC list is: get_sanctions_status. Every address verdict already carries freshness_seconds, so call this only for the block numbers or for a chain you have not asked about yet. On Solana (chain -1) safe_block is the finalized slot, and lag_blocks is near 0 by construction and never negative, so it is not a freshness signal there: read freshness_seconds. On the EVM chains and Tron a negative lag_blocks means the node's head went back. chain is the only parameter; omit it for Base. Light read, never waits for a slot. No auth; 1200 requests/min shared by all tools.

    Annotations the server declares

    • destructiveHint: false
    • idempotentHint: true
    • openWorldHint: true
    • readOnlyHint: true
  • get_wallet_graph_walkBounded walk over the indexed settlement graph of one stablecoin from one wallet on one chain: payer<->recipient hops with value-weighted scores, entity-aware node keys, a stop at …1 finding

    Why it is in this group

    • The name "get_wallet_graph_walk" says "get": a word for reading.

    Findings

    • Info

      The description is 2,898 characters long, over the 2,000 this check looks for.

      Matched text

      description ends: "...h or sanctioned node missing from those days is not evidence that there was none."

      What this check looks for
    Description, as the server wrote it
    Bounded walk over the indexed settlement graph of one stablecoin from one wallet on one chain: payer<->recipient hops with value-weighted scores, entity-aware node keys, a stop at known services and sanctioned-node markers. Use it to explain who an address settles with and through which hops. Not for a verdict: get_address_risk. Not for the taint class or haircut: get_address_exposure. Not for a flat list of transfers with tx hashes: get_recent_transactions. token is required and must be a stablecoin enabled on that chain (a refusal names them); hops=0 with stop_on_sanctioned=true is the cheapest check of the subject itself; subjects over the degree gate (~50k edge-rows) return hop 1 only with frontier_truncated=true. Heavy read: under load it answers busy or timeout — retry with backoff, a narrower window or a lower frontier_cap. No auth; 1200 requests/min shared by all tools. An explainability primitive, not a detector verdict, identity/control assertion, AML decision or legal advice. window_from present means the answer was built from that date, the edge-grain horizon, not from the start of the requested window; the default window all, 90d and 1y included (/v1/methodology edge_grain_horizon). When window_from is present, read the graph as covering that span only — do not treat the absence of a counterparty, a path or a sanctioned node as evidence about anything before that date. volume on nodes is the token's raw minor units (divide by 10^decimals); volume_usd6 is the same amount in USD with 6 decimals at peg 1. On Solana (chain -1) the answer carries coverage_status for the subject address only, never for its counterparties: pending — its history is still being filled, so an empty or small answer is not final; partial — filled to a documented bound. The walk shows a finished fill after the next Solana rollup pass (about 10 minutes), and never shows history older than window_from. This read never starts a fill, so pending can also mean none was asked for yet: one compliance read of the address asks for it. A Solana answer without coverage_status could not read it in time — treat it as pending. On Solana (chain -1) the edge grain of 2026-07-20..2026-09-14 is incomplete: those days hold part of their transfers or none, because their raw rows were offloaded before a fix reached production on 2026-09-17; they are not restored, and answers do not mark them (decision of 2026-09-17). Solana's grain is never trimmed, so there the horizon that window_from reports is not where retained data ends: once window_from is later than 2026-09-14 the answer holds none of those days. An answer that reaches them — window_from on or before 2026-09-14, or no window_from over a window that includes them — counts them as floors: at least this much, never the whole, and a counterparty, path or sanctioned node missing from those days is not evidence that there was none.

    Annotations the server declares

    • destructiveHint: false
    • idempotentHint: true
    • openWorldHint: true
    • readOnlyHint: true

This is not a safety rating, and no finding is not a safety guarantee. The groups and findings come from fixed checks of the tool definitions the server returned on the date shown, not from its code or what it does when called. How the checks work.

Install

Pinned to version 1.4.0. Values in angle brackets are yours to fill in.

claude mcp add --transport http stablescan https://stablescan.achivx.com/mcp

Run in a terminal.

Claude Code permissions

Allow the reads, ask before a change, deny the deletes. Paste into .claude/settings.json.

.claude/settings.json
{
  "permissions": {
    "allow": [
      "mcp__stablescan__get_address_compliance",
      "mcp__stablescan__get_address_exposure",
      "mcp__stablescan__get_address_risk",
      "mcp__stablescan__get_recent_transactions",
      "mcp__stablescan__get_sanctions_status",
      "mcp__stablescan__get_sync_status",
      "mcp__stablescan__get_wallet_graph_walk"
    ],
    "ask": [
      "mcp__stablescan__get_address_approvals"
    ],
    "deny": []
  }
}

Tools that only read are allowed, tools that change things ask first, tools that delete or cancel are denied. It assumes the server is installed as stablescan. Review it before you use it.