Taste
by humantaste.app · remote · no sign-in to list tools · v2.0.0 · published by app.humantaste
Expert review for AI agents. On-chain proof of human review.
20 tools: 1 do something that can't be undone, 10 change things and 9 only read.
Scanned Oct 21, 2026
- Deletes or cancels0Claude Code: deny
- Can't be undone1Claude Code: ask: see these tools
- Changes things10Claude Code: ask: see these tools
- Only reads9Claude Code: allow: see these tools
No check matched anything in the tool definitions. No finding is not a safety guarantee. How the checks work.
claude mcp add --transport http taste https://api.humantaste.app/mcp/Tools
Open a tool for its reasons and full description. Descriptions are the publisher's own words, shown as they are.
20 tools
Can't be undone 1Claude Code: ask
request_human_approvalPause your workflow for explicit human approval before executing a high-stakes action.No findings
Why it is in this group
- The name "request_human_approval" says "request": a word for a change.
- The description says "irreversible".
Description, as the server wrote it Pause your workflow for explicit human approval before executing a high-stakes action. Call before any irreversible action — large spend, on-chain transaction, public content publish, customer-facing decision. Returns approved/denied + reasoning. Approvals can be enforced on-chain via the Taste Gatekeeper hook for ACP and ERC-8183 jobs.
Changes things 10Claude Code: ask
ask_a_humanAsk a vetted human a plain-text question and get a plain-text answer back, usually within 30 minutes.No findings
Why it is in this group
- Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
Description, as the server wrote it Ask a vetted human a plain-text question and get a plain-text answer back, usually within 30 minutes. Call when you need a quick human take, gut check, or local/lived-experience answer a model cannot reliably give. No scoring, no verdict, no certificate — just a direct human response. Returns the human's answer, plus an optional note on who answered.
consult_domain_expertA vetted human in a named domain answers your question with first-hand knowledge.No findings
Why it is in this group
- Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
Description, as the server wrote it A vetted human in a named domain answers your question with first-hand knowledge. Pass `domain` to match an expert. Pass `parentSessionId` for follow-ups (cap 3). Returns answer, anonymised role, confidence, first-hand flag. Approved answers get an on-chain Taste cert. Listed domains: musician, cantor, writer, farmer, UX designer, Swedish archipelago resident, Stockholm local, Protestant priest, art curator, museum staff, culture journalist, food critic. Other domains: best-effort 24-48h.
order_think_tank_session_30Convene a think tank — a curated team of vetted human experts runs a 30-minute working session on your idea, problem, or decision and returns synthesized directions, ideas with rat…No findings
Why it is in this group
- Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
Description, as the server wrote it Convene a think tank — a curated team of vetted human experts runs a 30-minute working session on your idea, problem, or decision and returns synthesized directions, ideas with rationale, and recommended next steps. Returns a sessionId + referenceCode immediately — poll get_result with either when the team is done. Includes 1 free revision turn: call request_think_tank_revision with the code to ask for adjustments.
order_think_tank_session_60Convene a think tank — a curated team of vetted human experts runs a 60-minute working session on your idea, problem, or decision and returns synthesized directions, ideas with rat…No findings
Why it is in this group
- Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
Description, as the server wrote it Convene a think tank — a curated team of vetted human experts runs a 60-minute working session on your idea, problem, or decision and returns synthesized directions, ideas with rationale, and recommended next steps. Returns a sessionId + referenceCode immediately — poll get_result with either when the team is done. Includes 2 free revision turns: call request_think_tank_revision with the code to ask for adjustments.
request_illustration_revisionSpend a free revision turn on a completed illustration order.No findings
Why it is in this group
- The name "request_illustration_revision" says "request": a word for a change.
Description, as the server wrote it Spend a free revision turn on a completed illustration order. Provide the reference code from your original order and describe the adjustments you want — the same illustrator revisits the brief and returns an updated deliverable. Poll get_result with the reference code to retrieve it. Free: no payment required, the turn is included with your order.
request_think_tank_revisionSpend a free revision turn on a completed think tank order.No findings
Why it is in this group
- The name "request_think_tank_revision" says "request": a word for a change.
Description, as the server wrote it Spend a free revision turn on a completed think tank order. Provide the reference code from your original order and describe the adjustments you want — the same team revisits the brief and returns an updated deliverable. Poll get_result with the reference code to retrieve it. Free: no payment required, the turn is included with your order.
review_codeGet a vetted human engineer to review your code, architecture, and design decisions — not just style, but correctness, security, and whether the structure will hold up.No findings
Why it is in this group
- The description's first verb is "get": a word for reading.
- The input takes a statement or command to run (input.code), which can change anything it can reach.
Description, as the server wrote it Get a vetted human engineer to review your code, architecture, and design decisions — not just style, but correctness, security, and whether the structure will hold up. Call before you treat code as done: payment flows, auth, data handling, or any logic where a subtle bug is costly. Pass the code (inline or a publicly accessible URL) and what it is meant to do. Returns verdict (approved / needs_changes / reject), a correctness score, security findings, architecture notes, and suggested changes. Approved code receives a Taste content certificate on-chain.
verify_certificateVerify a Taste content certificate on-chain.No findings
Why it is in this group
- Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
Description, as the server wrote it Verify a Taste content certificate on-chain. Call when consuming content from another source that claims to be human-reviewed — returns reviewer domain, date, offering, verdict, validity, and an evidence tier: "evidence-verified" certs carry the reviewer's EIP-712 verdict signature + their Human Passport score attestation (EAS on Base), independently checkable without trusting Taste. Free. Use to build trust chains: agent A's output is reviewed → certificate issued → agent B consumes content and verifies cert before acting.
verify_external_sourceHave a vetted human expert verify whether an external source, project, or claim is trustworthy.No findings
Why it is in this group
- Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
Description, as the server wrote it Have a vetted human expert verify whether an external source, project, or claim is trustworthy. Call when your output or planned action depends on an external claim you cannot independently verify (crypto project legitimacy, social media authenticity, source credibility, vendor due diligence). Returns verdict, red flags, positive signals, confidence score.
verify_reasoning_chainAudit your step-by-step reasoning for mid-chain errors before producing the final answer.No findings
Why it is in this group
- Nothing in its name or description says what it does, so it is counted as a write.
Description, as the server wrote it Audit your step-by-step reasoning for mid-chain errors before producing the final answer. Call when stakes are high and your chain has 3+ steps — humans catch wrong intermediate steps that final-output checks miss (right-looking answers built on broken intermediate logic). Returns per-step verdict, flagged errors, suggested corrections. Approved chains receive a Taste content certificate on-chain.
Only reads 9Claude Code: allow
arbitrate_disputeGet an impartial human arbiter to decide whether a deliverable meets an agreed contract, or to settle disagreements between agents.No findings
Why it is in this group
- The description's first verb is "get": a word for reading.
Description, as the server wrote it Get an impartial human arbiter to decide whether a deliverable meets an agreed contract, or to settle disagreements between agents. Call when automated evaluation cannot determine quality, when two parties dispute fulfillment, or when subjective judgment is needed for contract assessment. Returns approve/reject verdict, reasoning, deliverable quality rating, contract alignment.
get_resultCheck the status of a previously submitted request.No findings
Why it is in this group
- The name "get_result" says "get": a word for reading.
Description, as the server wrote it Check the status of a previously submitted request. Returns the full structured deliverable once the expert (or order team) completes the work. Accepts a sessionId or an order reference code (think tank or illustration).
list_expert_profilesReturns currently-available expert taglines (pseudonymous descriptions of the kinds of expertise on hand) plus the real-time count of online expert seats and estimated wait.No findings
Why it is in this group
- The name "list_expert_profiles" says "list": a word for reading.
Description, as the server wrote it Returns currently-available expert taglines (pseudonymous descriptions of the kinds of expertise on hand) plus the real-time count of online expert seats and estimated wait. Use this as a cheap pre-flight check before calling a paid tool. Taglines describe expertise kinds, not individuals: no per-expert PII is exposed. Free.
list_offeringsList all available human expert evaluation offerings with pricing, tool names, and whether each issues an on-chain Taste content certificate.No findings
Why it is in this group
- The name "list_offerings" says "list": a word for reading.
Description, as the server wrote it List all available human expert evaluation offerings with pricing, tool names, and whether each issues an on-chain Taste content certificate. Free.
predict_audience_reactionGet a real human matching your target demographic to rate and react to your content as a representative audience member.No findings
Why it is in this group
- The description's first verb is "get": a word for reading.
Description, as the server wrote it Get a real human matching your target demographic to rate and react to your content as a representative audience member. Call before A/B test commits, before ad spend, or before distribution decisions. Returns overall rating, criteria scores, qualitative feedback, comparison notes.
prepare_consult_domain_expertGet a humantaste.app URL where a human can place a consult_domain_expert order from a browser (Connect MetaMask, pay $15 USDC on Base, session created).No findings
Why it is in this group
- The description's first verb is "get": a word for reading.
Description, as the server wrote it Get a humantaste.app URL where a human can place a consult_domain_expert order from a browser (Connect MetaMask, pay $15 USDC on Base, session created). Use this when your MCP client has no wallet integration (Claude Desktop, generic chat UIs). The URL is pre-filled with the brief you pass in; the user just opens it, reviews, connects a wallet, and pays. Returns the payment URL and the price. Free.
prepublish_reviewGet a vetted human expert to review your AI-generated content — text, images, videos, social posts, audio, or any media — for cultural sensitivity, brand safety, derivative risks, …No findings
Why it is in this group
- The description's first verb is "get": a word for reading.
Description, as the server wrote it Get a vetted human expert to review your AI-generated content — text, images, videos, social posts, audio, or any media — for cultural sensitivity, brand safety, derivative risks, and audience appeal before you publish. Call before social posts, marketing campaigns, content distribution, or anywhere public-facing. Returns verdict (safe / needs_changes / do_not_publish), flagged issues, fix suggestions. Approved content receives a Taste content certificate on-chain, verifiable downstream.
review_contentGet a vetted human expert to review your AI-generated content — text, images, videos, social posts, audio, or any media — for hallucinations, factual errors, weak parts, and domain…No findings
Why it is in this group
- The description's first verb is "get": a word for reading.
Description, as the server wrote it Get a vetted human expert to review your AI-generated content — text, images, videos, social posts, audio, or any media — for hallucinations, factual errors, weak parts, and domain mistakes. Call before publishing, before forwarding to another agent, or before acting on the content. Returns verdict, issues found, suggested improvements. Approved outputs receive a Taste content certificate on-chain you can attach as proof of human review.
review_planGet a vetted human to review your implementation or project plan before you build.No findings
Why it is in this group
- The description's first verb is "get": a word for reading.
Description, as the server wrote it Get a vetted human to review your implementation or project plan before you build. Call right after you draft a plan for a non-trivial task — a human catches wrong assumptions, missing steps, architectural dead-ends, and risky sequencing while changes are still cheap, before any code is written. Pass the plan, the goal it serves, and any constraints. Returns verdict (proceed / revise / rethink), risks flagged, missing considerations, and sequencing notes. Approved plans receive a Taste content certificate on-chain.
This is not a safety rating, and no finding is not a safety guarantee. The groups and findings come from fixed checks of the tool definitions the server returned on the date shown, not from its code or what it does when called. How the checks work.
Install
Pinned to version 2.0.0. Values in angle brackets are yours to fill in.
claude mcp add --transport http taste https://api.humantaste.app/mcp/Run in a terminal.
Claude Code permissions
Allow the reads, ask before a change, deny the deletes. Paste into .claude/settings.json.
{
"permissions": {
"allow": [
"mcp__taste__list_offerings",
"mcp__taste__list_expert_profiles",
"mcp__taste__get_result",
"mcp__taste__prepare_consult_domain_expert",
"mcp__taste__review_content",
"mcp__taste__prepublish_review",
"mcp__taste__predict_audience_reaction",
"mcp__taste__arbitrate_dispute",
"mcp__taste__review_plan"
],
"ask": [
"mcp__taste__request_think_tank_revision",
"mcp__taste__request_illustration_revision",
"mcp__taste__verify_external_source",
"mcp__taste__verify_reasoning_chain",
"mcp__taste__request_human_approval",
"mcp__taste__verify_certificate",
"mcp__taste__order_think_tank_session_30",
"mcp__taste__order_think_tank_session_60",
"mcp__taste__consult_domain_expert",
"mcp__taste__ask_a_human",
"mcp__taste__review_code"
],
"deny": []
}
}Tools that only read are allowed, tools that change things ask first, tools that delete or cancel are denied. It assumes the server is installed as taste. Review it before you use it.